Across the Greater Toronto Area, thousands of commercial and institutional buildings constructed between the 1950s and 1980s face a common challenge: aging roofing systems that contain asbestos and other hazardous materials. For property managers, facility directors, and general contractors responsible for these structures, re-roofing presents both an opportunity and a compliance obligation—protecting building occupants while addressing deteriorating roof performance.
Established in 1990, Nusite Group has executed commercial re-roofing projects on older institutional, industrial, and multi-tenant properties throughout the GTA and Southern Ontario. This technical overview explains how modern re-roofing strategies can safely encapsulate hazardous materials, when encapsulation is appropriate, and how regulatory frameworks in Ontario govern these complex projects.
Understanding Hazardous Materials in Commercial Roofing Systems
Asbestos in Built-Up Roofing Assemblies
Asbestos was extensively used in commercial roofing materials until the late 1970s and early 1980s. Common applications included:
- Asbestos-containing felts and plies in built-up roofing (BUR) systems
- Asbestos fiber reinforcement in roofing mastics and adhesives
- Asbestos insulation boards beneath roofing membranes
- Asbestos-cement flashing and counterflashing around penetrations and perimeters
These materials were valued for fire resistance, durability, and thermal performance. However, when roofing assemblies deteriorate—through weathering, mechanical damage, or repeated repairs—asbestos fibers can become friable and pose inhalation risks during maintenance or removal activities.
Coal Tar and Other Legacy Materials
Beyond asbestos, older commercial roofs may contain coal tar pitch, lead-based flashing materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing caulks. Each material presents distinct health, environmental, and regulatory considerations that must be addressed during re-roofing scope development.
For property managers overseeing institutional campuses, industrial facilities, or multi-story commercial buildings in Toronto’s urban core, identifying and managing these materials is a prerequisite to responsible roof replacement.
Encapsulation vs. Removal: Strategic Decision Framework
When Encapsulation Is Appropriate
Encapsulation—installing a new roofing system over an existing hazardous roof assembly—is a viable strategy when:
- The existing roof structure has adequate load-bearing capacity for additional weight
- The existing roof substrate is structurally sound without widespread deterioration
- Local building codes and regulations permit overlay installations
- Encapsulation costs are demonstrably lower than removal and disposal
- Building operations cannot tolerate the disruption of full tear-off and abatement
From a risk mitigation perspective, encapsulation eliminates worker and occupant exposure to airborne fibers that would result from removal activities. It also reduces project duration and avoids the logistical challenges of hazardous material disposal.
When Removal Is Required
Full removal and abatement become necessary when:
- Structural deck damage requires replacement
- Existing roof assembly is too deteriorated to support overlay systems
- Building codes mandate complete removal for the jurisdiction
- Encapsulation would exceed permissible roof load limits
- Long-term building plans involve major envelope rehabilitation that necessitates starting from the structural deck
General contractors and project managers must coordinate with designated substance surveys, structural engineers, and regulatory authorities to determine the appropriate approach for each building.

Re-Roofing Methods for Safe Encapsulation
Recover Systems: Overlaying Existing Assemblies
A recover or overlay system involves installing a new roofing membrane directly over the existing roof without disturbing hazardous materials beneath. This approach is common for commercial roofing contractors working on institutional and industrial buildings where asbestos-containing BUR systems remain intact.
Key Components of Recover Systems:
- Separation layer or cover board to create a clean substrate and prevent bonding to the existing roof
- New insulation layer to improve thermal performance and meet current energy code requirements
- New roofing membrane (TPO, EPDM, modified bitumen, or coating systems) providing renewed waterproofing and UV protection
- Perimeter and penetration flashing designed to integrate with the new assembly without disturbing existing materials
For buildings in the GTA where winter temperatures and thermal cycling stress roofing assemblies, recover systems must be engineered for cold-weather performance and condensation control.
Protective Coating Systems
Roof coating technologies—acrylic, silicone, or polyurethane-based—can extend the service life of existing commercial roofs while encapsulating asbestos-containing materials beneath. These systems are particularly effective for metal roofing, modified bitumen, and single-ply membranes showing surface wear but retaining structural integrity.
Coating systems offer:
- Minimal disruption to building operations
- Lower project costs compared to full re-roofing
- Reflective properties that reduce cooling loads
- Renewable maintenance cycles that defer complete replacement
However, coating systems require thorough surface preparation, and substrate conditions must meet manufacturer specifications to ensure adhesion and warranty coverage.
Structural Considerations for Overlay Installations
Before any encapsulation strategy proceeds, structural analysis must confirm that the existing roof deck can support additional dead loads. This is especially critical for older buildings in Toronto’s inventory where original designs may not account for modern insulation thicknesses or multiple roof layers.
A qualified structural engineer should evaluate:
- Existing deck material and condition (concrete, steel, wood)
- Current roof assembly weight
- Proposed overlay system weight
- Snow load capacity per Ontario Building Code requirements
- Deflection limits for roofing membrane performance
For reroofing contractors executing these projects, coordination with structural consultants and building officials is essential to ensure code compliance and long-term safety.
Regulatory Compliance in Ontario
Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) Requirements
Under Ontario’s OHSA and Regulation 278/05 (Designated Substance – Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations), any commercial roofing project involving known or suspected asbestos must comply with strict protocols:
- Pre-project asbestos survey conducted by a qualified designated substance surveyor
- Written work plan detailing encapsulation or abatement procedures
- Worker training and respiratory protection for personnel working near asbestos-containing materials
- Air monitoring if disturbance of friable asbestos is possible
- Record-keeping and reporting to the Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development
Even when encapsulation strategies avoid direct disturbance, general contractors must document the presence of hazardous materials and ensure subcontractors understand site conditions.
Environmental Compliance Act (ECA) and Waste Management
If partial removal or abatement occurs during re-roofing—such as removing damaged sections of asbestos-containing felts—waste disposal must follow Ontario Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management). Asbestos waste is classified as hazardous, requiring:
- Transport by licensed hazardous waste carriers
- Disposal at approved facilities
- Manifest documentation tracking waste from generation to final disposal
For property managers and facility teams, understanding these regulatory obligations is critical to budgeting and contractor selection. Non-compliance exposes organizations to significant penalties and project delays.
Ontario Building Code (OBC) and Overlay Limitations
The Ontario Building Code limits the number of roof layers permitted on commercial buildings. Section 9.23 and Division B provisions restrict overlays to prevent excessive dead loads and ensure fire safety. In many cases, only one re-roofing overlay is permitted before complete removal is required.
Commercial roofing contractors operating in the GTA must verify existing roof history and confirm that proposed encapsulation strategies comply with OBC requirements and local building department interpretations.
How Nusite Group Approaches Hazardous Material Encapsulation Projects
With over 30 years of experience on commercial and institutional roofing projects, Nusite Group has executed numerous re-roofing scopes involving asbestos-containing assemblies. Our approach prioritizes safety, regulatory compliance, and long-term roof performance.
Pre-Construction Assessment and Coordination
Before any physical work begins, we coordinate with designated substance surveyors, review existing building documentation, and develop site-specific work plans. For general contractors managing complex projects, this early engagement ensures that roofing scopes align with overall construction schedules and regulatory timelines.
Encapsulation System Design
We work with roofing system manufacturers and building envelope consultants to engineer overlay assemblies that meet structural, thermal, and waterproofing requirements. Material selection considers Ontario’s climate demands—freeze-thaw resistance, wind uplift capacity, and thermal cycling performance.
Execution and Quality Control
Our field teams are trained in asbestos awareness and safe work practices. During installation, we implement protective measures to prevent disturbance of underlying materials, including controlled access zones, containment protocols where necessary, and coordination with air quality monitoring when specified.
Documentation and Warranty Compliance
Upon project completion, we provide general contractors and property managers with comprehensive documentation: material certifications, installation records, manufacturer warranties, and as-built drawings. This record-keeping supports future maintenance planning and regulatory audits.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I know if my commercial building’s roof contains asbestos?
Any commercial or institutional building constructed before 1990 should be presumed to contain asbestos-containing materials until a qualified designated substance surveyor confirms otherwise. Ontario regulations require a formal asbestos survey before roofing work begins. Property managers should engage licensed surveyors to inspect roof assemblies, collect samples, and provide laboratory-confirmed reports documenting material types and locations.
Is encapsulation as safe as complete asbestos removal?
When properly executed, encapsulation is a safe and effective strategy that eliminates exposure risks by leaving asbestos-containing materials undisturbed and sealed beneath new roofing assemblies. Removal generates airborne fiber risks during abatement activities and produces hazardous waste requiring specialized disposal. Regulatory authorities, including Ontario’s Ministry of Labour, recognize encapsulation as an acceptable approach when structural and code conditions permit.
What is the cost difference between encapsulation and removal?
Encapsulation typically costs 30-50% less than full removal and abatement because it eliminates hazardous material handling, disposal fees, and extended project timelines. However, cost comparisons must account for structural capacity upgrades, building code limitations on overlay installations, and long-term maintenance considerations. General contractors should request detailed cost breakdowns from reroofing contractors that include engineering assessments, regulatory compliance measures, and warranty provisions.
Can all types of commercial roofs be encapsulated?
Encapsulation feasibility depends on existing roof condition, structural capacity, and building code compliance. Built-up roofing systems in sound condition are typically good candidates. Severely deteriorated roofs with widespread leaks, deck damage, or structural deficiencies require removal and replacement. Metal roofing, modified bitumen, and single-ply systems may be candidates for coating-based encapsulation if surface preparation is viable. Each project requires individual assessment by qualified roofing professionals and structural engineers.
Execute Safe, Compliant Re-Roofing Projects
Nusite Group has delivered commercial roofing solutions on institutional, industrial, and multi-tenant properties across the GTA and Southern Ontario since 1990. Our experience includes re-roofing projects involving asbestos encapsulation, regulatory coordination, and integration into occupied building environments where operational continuity is critical.
Fully bonded, licensed across Ontario, and insured to $10 million in liability coverage, Nusite Group operates as a dependable commercial roofing contractor for property managers, facility directors, and general contractors who require technical expertise and regulatory compliance on complex re-roofing scopes.
Request a consultation to discuss your building’s re-roofing requirements or explore how Nusite Group can support your next project with safe, compliant encapsulation strategies.

